Amid the ‘don’t Say Gay’ Clash, Disney Will Lose Its Special Tax Status in Florida!

In the state capital of Florida, Disney employs 38 lobbyists. During each election cycle, the corporation contributes generously to candidates on all sides of the political spectrum in Florida.

Its theme park mega-resort in Orlando draws roughly 50 million people each year, generating more than $5 billion in local and state tax money.

The bottom line is that Disney usually gets what it wants in Florida.

That era came to an end on Thursday, when the Florida House voted to rescind Disney World’s designation as a special tax district, which the business has held for 55 years and allowed it to effectively self-govern its 25,000-acre theme park complex.

The Reedy Creek Improvement District, a special zone in Florida, was repealed by the Florida Senate on Wednesday. Gov. Ron DeSantis, who paved the path to this result with a formal proclamation, will almost definitely sign the bill to make it legal. It would go into effect in June of the following year.

The Florida Republicans’ hasty attempt to dissolve Reedy Creek has been widely interpreted as audacious vengeance after Disney, the state’s largest private employer, halted political donations in the state and opposed a new education law dubbed “Don’t Say Gay” by opponents.

The law, among other things, bars discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in Florida classrooms until third grade and restricts it for older kids.

In a fundraising email to supporters on Wednesday, DeSantis, a potential Republican presidential candidate in 2024, said, “If Disney wants to pick a battle, they chose the wrong guy.

” He went on to say, “I will not allow a woke corporation situated in California to control our state.” “For far too long, Disney has gotten away with special agreements from the state of Florida.”

“Disney felt they ruled Florida,” DeSantis continued. They even attempted to assassinate me in order to further their woke agenda.”

Disney has remained silent about the matter.

Experts estimate that the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which was established in 1967 to entice Disney to build a theme park 20 miles south of Orlando, saves the firm millions of dollars in fees and taxes each year.

Reedy Creek may also be able to help Disney with financing. Disney, for example, had Reedy Creek issue bonds to cover the expense of constructing a road junction near its Hollywood Studios park at Disney World a few years ago.

(By contrast, when Disney needed municipal infrastructure in Anaheim, California, to build its California Adventure theme park in the 1990s, the firm had to persuade the city to issue the bonds.)

Disney Will Lose Its Special Tax

The real value of the special district to Disney, however, is not cash; it is controlled.

Disney has significant control over the planning and approval process for projects on its enormous land, including road construction, thanks to Reedy Creek.

Reedy Creek also charges Disney taxes to cover the costs of the resort’s own fire and medical response battalions, among other things. Disney World even uses Reedy Creek to generate some of its own electricity.

“The impact on Disney is more symbolic than real money,” a Wells Fargo analyst, Steven Cahall, wrote in an email, “though political theatre is never good for market sentiment.”

Hundreds of such special tax districts would be preserved throughout Florida. The Villages, a vast senior-living community northwest of Orlando, is the subject of one. The Daytona International Speedway and its environs are covered by another.

The designation has helped Disney expand the resort, which includes six theme parks, an expansive outdoor shopping mall, a 220-acre basketball, soccer, volleyball, lacrosse, baseball, and competitive cheer complex, and 18 Disney-owned hotels with a total capacity of 24,000 rooms. The bus fleet in Disney World is comparable to that of St. Louis.

According to a Disney filing, Disney World paid moreover $780 million in state and local taxes in 2021.

Disney World lies on the border of two counties, Orange and Osceola, which would be compelled by state law to step in and offer a version of the services currently provided by Reedy Creek, almost definitely resulting in higher taxes for inhabitants of both counties.

According to Orange County’s tax collector, Scott Randolph, citizens’ property taxes might rise by as much as 20%. According to public statistics, Reedy Creek has a $355 million annual budget. It owes $977 million in debt to the counties, which would be transferred to them as well.

If the district is abolished, Disney may apply to reinstate it. Instead, the corporation could scale back its growth plans for the resort.

Disney and DeSantis had already clashed on pandemic issues, including a proposed vaccine mandate for employees. Disney, on the other hand, benefited from his strong attempt to reopen Florida for business in 2020, despite an increase in coronavirus illnesses.

Disney World reopened in July 2020 after closing in March. (By comparison, due to California’s stricter pandemic restrictions, the firm won’t be able to reopen Disneyland until April 2021.)

The company’s spat with the state of Florida is the latest illustration of how speaking up on social and political issues can put businesses at odds with legislators.

Georgia politicians threatened to increase Delta Air Lines’ taxes last year after the airline came out against the state’s restrictive voting laws.

Texas lawmakers recently announced that Citigroup would be barred from underwriting municipal bonds in the state unless the bank repealed its policy of paying for workers to go out of state for abortions, which are illegal in the state.

More Topics:

DeSantis and Disney’s feud began on March 9, when the company, under intense pressure from its employees, spoke out against the Parents Rights in Education Act, sometimes known as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.

A Human Rights Campaign letter opposing the law has previously been signed by over 150 firms, including Marriott and American Airlines.

Disney, on the other hand, has avoided taking a public stance, with CEO Bob Chapek stating in a statement to staff on March 7 that he did not want the firm to become “a political football.”

With pressure mounting on Disney to criticize the law, Chapek did so two days later. He also stated that he had phoned DeSantis “to voice our dismay and fear that the proposal could be utilized to unfairly target gay, lesbian, nonbinary, and transgender children and families if it becomes law.”

“The governor listened to our concerns and agreed to meet with me and LGBTQ+ members of our senior team in Florida to discuss solutions,” Chapek added.

That appeared to enrage DeSantis, resulting in a tussle between his press secretary and a Disney spokesman. Disney continued its criticism after DeSantis signed the bill into law on March 28.

“As a corporation, our aim is for this law to be repealed by the Legislature or overturned in the courts,” Disney said at the time. “We remain committed to helping the national and state organizations working to achieve that.”

The state of Florida then threatened to withdraw Disney World’s special tax district.

The Florida Legislature met in extraordinary sessions this week to discuss congressional redistricting. DeSantis signed a proclamation on Tuesday allowing the Republican-controlled legislature to consider the abolition of special districts constituted before 1968.

With the exception of Disney, almost all were established after that date.

Reply